AI
European retailer Hans Anders stops selling smart glasses in Belgium and the Netherlands, citing privacy concerns amid global scrutiny.

A significant shift has occurred within the optical retail sector. Hans Anders, a major European glasses retailer, will cease selling smart glasses at its locations in Belgium and the Netherlands. The decision stems from persistent privacy worries associated with the technology.
The company’s move reflects growing unease among various societal groups, including courts, educators, restaurants, and celebrities. A representative for Hans Anders explained that the choice follows ongoing public and political debates about smart glasses. They specifically noted questions regarding the conditions under which this technology can be used.
This development aligns with increased worldwide examination of smart glasses, particularly across Europe. In Germany, Hamburg’s parliament adopted a resolution to prohibit wearing these devices in certain public spaces. The ban covers areas such as transit systems and public pools due to fears of discreet recording.
In the United Kingdom, Wetherspoons, a popular pub chain, implemented a similar restriction. The company banned recording with smart glasses in its more than 800 owned pubs across England and Ireland. These actions were taken for reasons comparable to those cited by German authorities.
Tensions are rising beyond Europe. While comprehensive federal regulation remains absent in the United States, local and corporate measures have emerged. New York State prohibited smart glasses in courtrooms throughout the state. Additionally, American companies like Royal Caribbean restricted their use on cruise liners.
Lawmakers in the US have begun investigating tech firms, including Meta, regarding potential facial recognition features. Reports from Wired indicate that Meta is interested in introducing such controversial technology. This inquiry occurs despite the lack of established federal guidelines.
The debate over where and when smart glasses should be used continues to expand. Documented cases involving extortion and harassment using these devices have been reported. Women are frequently targeted more often than men in these incidents.
From a technological standpoint, current models may represent the best available options for ownership. However, the societal context surrounding their use remains increasingly fraught.