·
·
Friday, 16 October 2026dailybeirut.com
Lifestyle
Meghan Markle wore a £1,495 burgundy coat by British label Joseph during her first post-return UK outing in Nottingham.
Alicia Liberty posited that Meghan Markle’s attire during her initial public appearance since returning to the United Kingdom carried symbolic weight. The Duchess of Sussex selected a £1,495 “Dona” coat, crafted from a wool and cashmere blend by the British luxury brand Joseph, for her visit to Nottingham alongside Prince Harry.
The expert observed that the specific combination of designer choice and color palette might serve as a subtle acknowledgment of Princess Catherine’s influence. Liberty highlighted that Catherine has long supported Joseph and notably chose burgundy for significant diplomatic engagements. This alignment suggests Markle’s look evoked memories of her early tenure while mirroring Catherine’s established aesthetic preferences.
Liberty detailed how the oversized silhouette, monochromatic styling, and sleek ponytail recalled one of Catherine’s memorable public appearances. She questioned whether the selection could be interpreted as a nod of respect toward the Princess of Wales, given Catherine’s history with the same label and hue. The comparison draws attention to the visual continuity between the two royals’ fashion strategies.
The couple’s itinerary included visits to three charitable organizations: Community Recording Studio, Himmah Food Bank, and Epic Partners. This location holds personal significance, as Nottingham was the site of their first joint public appearance following their 2017 engagement announcement. The return to this city marked a deliberate choice for their re-emergence on the UK stage.
Reports from The Times indicate these recent engagements may set a precedent for future public activities within the country. The outings occurred more than a month after the pair reportedly moved back to the UK for an extended period. They currently reside in private accommodation outside London and do not receive security funded by taxpayers.
Buckingham Palace recently issued a clarification regarding the couple’s standing. The institution stated that the Sussexes are “private individuals.” Their charitable work is described as personal endeavors rather than official duties affiliated with the royal family. This distinction underscores the separation between their current activities and formal royal responsibilities.
