Miscellaneous
A master’s student recounted an interview where the employer asked if she would work for free if another candidate was hired.

During a job interview, a graduate student encountered a startling request from a prospective employer: to work without compensation should they choose another candidate. The young woman, currently pursuing her master’s degree, shared the incident with a friend, describing how the interviewer expressed strong interest in her profile before posing the question about unpaid labor.
According to the account, the employer stated that while they liked the applicant significantly, they were considering hiring someone else. In this context, the interviewer asked whether the student would be willing to accept a position without any salary. Although she recounted the conversation with laughter, the graduate student could not conceal her surprise at the proposal.
The applicant noted that she has spent years in education and had previously engaged in volunteer work specifically to enhance her resume. Confronted with the demand to work for free after such extensive preparation, she found the situation baffling. The exchange highlighted a disconnect between the value of her qualifications and the employer’s expectation of uncompensated effort.
Following the publication of her experience, online users reacted strongly against the suggestion. Commentators argued that a job seeker’s educational background and professional experience do not justify being exploited for free labor. The consensus among those evaluating the post was that demanding unpaid work undermines the fundamental principle of fair compensation for skills and time invested.
This incident has reignited discussions regarding the expectations placed on candidates during recruitment processes. It underscores the tension between employers seeking flexibility and applicants who view their academic and professional history as assets that warrant proper remuneration rather than voluntary service.



