Kylie Jenner faces fourth lawsuit alleging torture and labor violations

Kylie Jenner is facing a new legal challenge as a former domestic worker filed a lawsuit accusing the reality television star of torture and multiple labor violations. This marks the fourth such claim brought by former employees within seven months, centering on allegations regarding working conditions inside Jenner’s residence and the nature of her treatment toward staff.

Allegations of confinement and injury

Dinora Carolina Cabrera Amaya submitted a formal complaint to the Los Angeles Superior Court, naming Jenner, her affiliated companies, and several staff members as defendants. According to court documents obtained by Page Six, the suit alleges violations including disability discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, and failure to pay owed financial dues.

Amaya stated she began working for Kylie Cosmetics in March 2025 at an hourly rate of $40, paid in cash, while working six days per week. She claimed she did not consistently receive overtime pay and was assigned exhausting shifts that required constant travel between Jenner’s properties without compensation for mileage or travel time.

The filing details specific incidents allegedly occurring during her employment. Amaya asserted that supervisor Laura Dolly instructed her to enter Jenner’s closet using a secret code, after which the door was locked from the outside for more than an hour. While trapped, Amaya said she called Dolly in panic requesting help, but the supervisor reportedly laughed, mocked her, and refused to provide the password, telling her to wait until the door opened.

In another incident dated September 2025, Amaya alleged she suffered injuries when pepper spray mist from an unsecured container hit her eyes and face while cleaning a drawer in the laundry room. She reported long-term health issues resulting from the exposure, including blurred vision, burning sensations, dryness, irritation, and a persistent feeling of grit in her eyes.

Additionally, Amaya claimed she was bitten by a dog in October 2025 while cleaning a kennel at one of Jenner’s properties. Although she notified management, she stated no assistance was provided, forcing her to purchase medical treatment out of pocket. The lawsuit also alleges she received repeated instructions to leave rooms and stay out of sight because Jenner “did not want to see her.” Her employment ended abruptly on February 6, following an inquiry about why another worker received travel reimbursement while she did not.

Legal responses and prior claims

Delia Shaker, attorney for the plaintiff, framed the case as part of a broader issue affecting domestic workers who fear reporting illegal treatment due to the perceived power of their employers. She emphasized that truth should not be buried by wealth, fear, or silence.

Michael Rhodes, representing Kylie Jenner, issued a statement defending his client and noting that successive lawsuits are being filed by the same attorney representing former employees. Rhodes characterized the litigation as an attempt to extract unwarranted sums through publicity, asserting they would not be intimidated and would vigorously defend against baseless claims.

This latest action joins a series of legal disputes involving Jenner this year, all linked by representation from the same lawyer for the former workers. On April 17, former housekeeper Angelica Hernandez Vasquez sued, alleging harassment and discrimination based on her Salvadoran heritage, Catholic faith, and immigrant status. She claimed mockery over her accent and coercion into unwanted tasks; the case recently underwent a conference to manage litigation procedures.

On April 29, another former housekeeper, Juana Delgado Soto, filed suit accusing Jenner and her companies of discrimination and harassment. Delgado Soto alleged she was forbidden from looking at or smiling at Jenner and forced to hide in bathrooms or garages for hours when the star was home. Her complaint included claims of denied drinking water and inhumane treatment following her brother’s death.

The third lawsuit, registered on June 22, was brought by an anonymous private chef under the legal name Jane Doe. She accused the team of pregnancy discrimination and wrongful termination, claiming she suffered a miscarriage after being forced to work exhausting shifts during a family event in Palm Springs, despite officials knowing her pregnancy was high-risk.

The same companies and supervisors appear as defendants across multiple cases in this chain. All allegations remain legally unproven pending trial sessions and official proceedings.