Miscellaneous
Tunisian Court Defers Corruption Trial of Ex-Transport Minister
Tunisia’s specialized criminal court has postponed the appeal trial of former Transport Minister Abdelkarim El Harouni and businessman Mohamed Frikha, along with four others, to October, amid convictions including seven-year prison terms handed down at first instance.

Tunisia’s specialized criminal chamber at the Court of Appeal has deferred the appeal hearing in a major financial corruption case involving oil-sector influence peddling to October. The case centers on allegations of illicit profit-taking and abuse of authority within Tunisia’s national petroleum sector.
Deferral amid pending appeals
The court adjourned the proceedings against Abdelkarim El Harouni, former minister of transport and senior figure in the Ennahda Movement; businessman Mohamed Frikha; two former officials of Tunisia’s National Petroleum Authority; and additional defendants. The new hearing is scheduled for October.
Origins of the charges
The defendants were referred to trial in custody by the Indictment Chamber following investigations that uncovered suspicions of corruption and unlawful commercial facilitation between a company owned by Mohamed Frikha and Tunisia’s National Petroleum Authority.
Formal charges under Tunisian law
The Tunisian Public Prosecution formally charged all defendants under Article 96 of the Tunisian Penal Code. The charges allege that a public official exploited his position to obtain an unjustified benefit—either for himself or for others—and intentionally harmed state administration while violating applicable laws and regulations.
First-instance sentences remain in force
The defendants currently face enforceable prison sentences issued by the Criminal Chamber of the Tunisian Court of First Instance. Those rulings include: a seven-year term for Mohamed Frikha; a two-year term for Abdelkarim El Harouni; and six-year terms for the two former National Petroleum Authority officials and the remaining defendants.
Case remains open pending appellate review
With the trial now rescheduled for October, the case remains legally active and subject to all possible outcomes as the defendants’ appeals proceed through the judicial process.
Latest news

Salim calls Bery before his visit to the US, discusses developments in the south

Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico, and MSNBC from the White House

Egypt Imposes Age Restrictions on Social Media Accounts to Protect Children


