World
After Ratcliffe's Visit to Russia, Estonia Suspects U.S. Prioritizing Iran Over Baltic Security
Estonian former president Thomas Hendrik Ilves questions the U.S. rationale for sending CIA Director John Ratcliffe to Moscow, suggesting Washington's focus remains on Iran rather than Baltic security concerns.

Former Estonian President Thomas Hendrik Ilves, one of the most prominent voices in European security debates, expressed doubts that the United States had sent CIA Director John Ratcliffe to Moscow to warn Russia against escalation, emphasizing that Washington remains more preoccupied with the Iranian file.
Ilves revealed he has "significant doubts" about Baltic security concerns being the motive behind Ratcliffe's visit, despite repeated reports claiming Washington sought to send a message to Moscow warning it against any form of aggression, according to Yuruniws.
He asked: "What is the real problem facing the United States right now? The real problem is Iran, and the fact that the Russians are providing Iranians with information about targets."
He added: "Those are the real issues for the United States, and that alone is sufficient to prompt the CIA director to go to Moscow and demand they back down."
U.S. media reported that CIA Director arrived in Moscow to warn Russia against attacking NATO members, amid fears that Russia might test the alliance, possibly by targeting Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania.
But Ilves questioned this explanation, stating there has been "no change" in the U.S. assessment of threats facing the Baltic states.
He continued: "If the goal was for him to honestly tell the Russians not to do anything in the Baltic states, as claimed, we would have seen some kind of activity here."
Meanwhile, Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsaknā said on Thursday that Estonia’s threat assessment "has not changed," while stressing the need to take seriously the possibility of Russian provocations against NATO.
He added: "We remain vigilant, but Estonia’s assessment of threats has not changed."
Ilves speculated that framing Baltic concerns as the central reason for Ratcliffe’s visit might be an attempt to divert attention from the actual subject discussed during the talks.
He said: "I don’t think it’s a false flag operation, but I see it as mere fabrication of a narrative to shift attention away from the real issue the United States is currently facing."
Ilves voiced similar skepticism regarding reports of escalating Russian military threats to the Baltic states.
When asked about the series of warnings issued over recent months about Moscow potentially escalating against Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania, Ilves stated: "I believe all of this is media manipulation." He questioned: "Why would they do anything in the Baltic states at this time?"
Ilves pointed out that, in his view, Russia lacks a significant strategic reason to risk direct confrontation with NATO while still engaged in its war against Ukraine.
He clarified that Europe now bears the bulk of the burden supporting Ukraine, including funding for American-made weapons delivered to Kyiv.
He said: "No major assistance has actually been provided to Ukraine since January 2025. All the burden falls on Europeans."
He noted this leaves Washington with little leverage to offer Moscow in exchange for cooperation on Iran, at Ukraine’s expense. He stated: "I really don’t see that the United States has much."
Referring to remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump himself about leverage cards available in negotiations, Ilves added: "They don’t have the cards."
Latest news

Study: Hormone Therapy Linked to Lower Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer’s in Women

Did the Good Loan Go Hidden in 'Ali al-Taher'?

Mines and Oil: Washington Reveals Latest Results of Iran's Maritime Blockade and Navigation in Hormuz


